49. Comparison of UAV images processing softwares
Jurate Suziedelyte Visockiene1, Domantas Brucas2, Ugnius Ragauskas3
1, 3Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania
2Space Science and Technology Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania
E-mail: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
(Received 19 April 2014; received in revised form 1 June 2014; accepted 10 June 2014)
Abstract. Recently, the aircrafts tend to be replaced by unmanned, light, simple, aerial vehicles (UAVs), same can be said about the field of aerial photogrammetry. UAV system besides the standard airframe and engine includes main processor board, Inertial Navigation System (INS), Global Positions Systems (GPS), telemetry module. For areal imaging purposes there can be a photo camera mounted too. The images taken by the areal camera can later be processed by software which is specialized for photogrammetry. The project of testing Pix4d Mapper (Switzerland) and PhotoMod (Russia) software programs is described in this paper. Pix4d Mapper is software specialized for UAV images proceedings meanwhile PhotoMod is designed for common photogrammetry proceedings. PhotoMod request some special photogrammetric knowledge from the user. There were 36 images processed producing ortho-mosaic and surface model. The results are further described in the paper.
Keywords: unmanned aerial vehicle, GPS navigation, GCP point, photogrammetry, image processing, ortho-mosaic.
 Chiabrando F., Piatti D., Rinaudo F. UAV and PRV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaeological areas: two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 38, Issue 3, 2011, p. 697‑710.
 Kim J., Lee S., Ahn H., Seo D., Park S., Choi C. Feasibility of employing a smartphone as the payload in a photogrammetric UAV system. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Vol. 79, 2013, p. 1‑18.
 Pérez M., Agüera F., Carvajal F. Low cost surveying using an unmanned aerial vehicle. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. XL1/W2, UAV-g, Rostock, Germany, 2013.
 Yun M., Kim J., Seo D., Lee J., Choi C. Application possibility of smartphone as payload for photogrammetric UAV system. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 39, Issue B4, 2012, p. 349‑352.
 Sužiedelytė-Visockienė J., Bručas D. Influence of digital camera errors on the photogrammetric image processing. Journal of Geodesy and Cartography, Vol. 35, Issue 1, 2009, p. 29‑33.
 Sužiedelytė-Visockienė J. Photogrammetry requirements for digital camera calibration applying Tcc and MatLab software. Journal of Geodesy and Cartography, Vol. 38, Isssue 3, 2012, p. 106‑110.
 Pix 4d Mappe. https://support.pix4d.com/entries/36814253-Features-description, 2014.
 Pix 4d Mapper output format, https://support.pix4d.com/entries/36814253-Features-description.
 Technical Support department. Accuracy control at various stages of photogrammetric processing in PhotoMod system. The Federal Agency of Geodesy and Cartography of Russia, http://www.racurs.ru/?page=586, 2012.
 Quality Report. Help, 2014, ftp://mail.dmme.virginia.gov/DMLR/EbeeDemo/dmme/report/ dmme_report_help.pdf.
 PhotoMod System. http://photomod.galantis.com/, 2014.
 Laliberte A. S., Jeffrey E. H., Rango A., Winters C. Acquisition, or the rectification, and object-based classification of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imagery for rangeland monitoring. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 76, Issue 6, 2010, p. 661‑672.
Cite this article
Suziedelyte Visockiene Jurate, Brucas Domantas, Ragauskas Ugnius Comparison of UAV images processing softwares. Journal of Measurements in Engineering, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 2014, p. 111‑121.
Journal of Measurements in
Engineering. June 2014, Volume 2, Issue 2